Research insights, technical deep-dives, and industry analysis from the team building the future of post-compromise digital signatures.
The cybersecurity industry is racing to adopt post-quantum cryptographic standards. But in the rush to quantum-proof our algorithms, we're ignoring a more fundamental problem: what happens when keys are compromised? PCS offers the answer that PQC alone cannot.
A deep dive into Dynamic Learning With Rounding — the mathematical core that enables PhoenixSig's forward-secure state evolution without relying on external randomness.
→Certificate Revocation Lists have been the default compromise response for decades. Here's why they fundamentally cannot provide the guarantees that modern environments require — and what replaces them.
→NSA's CNSA 2.0 suite sets aggressive deadlines for post-quantum migration. We break down the timeline, what it means for signature infrastructure, and where PCS fits into the picture.
→These two properties are frequently confused. Forward secrecy protects the past. PCS protects the future. Understanding why both require fundamentally different mechanisms is crucial to building resilient systems.
→In electronic warfare, devices will be captured. In SIGINT operations, software will be compromised. How military cryptographic requirements led us to design PhoenixSig's recovery model.
→A practical guide to using Trusted Execution Environments as cryptographic trust anchors. Covers Android Keystore, Secure Enclave, Intel SGX, and the tradeoffs between each for non-exportable key storage.
→Subscribe for new posts on PQC, PCS, and cryptographic engineering.